Michael Jackson vs. the IRS: The Valuation Fight Over One Asset That Proved a Huge Point
Valuation experts for the Estate of Michael Jackson battle the IRS in the U.S. Tax Court and ultimately told the IRS to "Beat It! Beat It!"
STRATEGIC PLANNINGBUSINESS VALUATIONESTATE TAX& PLANNING
D. Brumley
3/10/202613 min read
Michael Jackson vs. the IRS: The Valuation Fight Over One Asset That Proved a Huge Point
When people hear “business valuation,” they picture spreadsheets, formulas, and math that makes their eye twitch.
But valuation is not fortune-telling. It’s an educated opinion about the future, built using the past and what was knowable at a specific point in time. A valuation expert develops an opinion and then defends it.
And because the future hasn’t happened yet, you can’t have “facts” about it. The only fact about the future is that... it’s coming.
Nobody ever gets it right; but we get close. If you ever meet someone who can predict future cash flows perfectly… I’m going to need them to play the lottery for me.
Related Reading:
→ How Future Cash Flows Become a Value Today (without the math headache)
→ Why Business Owners Should Get a Forecast Every Year
That’s why valuation is part math… and part supporting your assumptions with real evidence.
And one of the most famous examples of that—especially for intangible assets—is the IRS valuation dispute involving the Estate of Michael Jackson.
2009 → Michael Jackson passes away
2011 → Tax return for his Estate likely filed early 2011 (9 months + 6 month extension)
2013 → IRS audits the return and the battle begins
2021 → The case is finally over more than a decade after his death
First, the biggest misconception: we are NOT talking about everything the King of Pop owned
Let’s clear this up right now: this case was not “What was Michael Jackson worth?” in a broad, tabloid sense.
We are talking about one piece of the Estate: Michael Jackson’s image and likeness (right of publicity). And yes, there were other disputed interests involved too—three assets total in the Tax Court fight—but the jaw-dropping numbers everyone repeats are about image. [2]
That matters, because high-wealth estates don’t keep everything in one bucket. Assets are often separated into different entities and structures: image is held in one LLC, music interests in another, real estate elsewhere, etc. [2]
This case—when we talk about the “image” numbers—was specifically about that one bucket: his image.
And for a celebrity? Image is everything.
Public perception can take a celeb's endorsements, brand deals, licensing opportunities, and earning power from “printing money” to “good luck with that” real fast. Just ask Martha Stewart or Lindsay Lohan.
The part that made everyone’s jaw drop: the gap between the experts' numbers
Here’s why this case became legendary in the valuation world:
The estate tax return reported Michael Jackson’s image at $2,105. (That's not a typo. A little over two grand.) [2]
After auditing the return, the IRS issued a notice of deficiency asserting his image was worth $434.2 million. (Also not a typo.) [2]
By the time the case got to trial, positions had narrowed. The IRS argued image value was $161.3 million while the Estate argued $3.1 million [2]
That’s not a little disagreement. That’s a “we are not living on the same planet” disagreement. That's a $400 million difference between the experts' opinions as to the value. Million with an "M". Sheesh.
What the Estate's valuation experts did right: argument backed by evidence
This wasn’t “my opinion versus your opinion.” It was “my opinion with receipts versus your opinion with… confidence.”
The Estate brought in experts for the image valuation and they supported assumptions with research rather than storytelling. [3]
Because in a Tax Court fight, you can’t walk in and say: “I just feel like it’s worth this much.”
That’s not a valuation. That’s a prayer.
For most people, the mere thought of the IRS knocking on their door is enough to keep them up at night but, at the end of the day, the expert for the IRS is also a human being. He had an opinion of value too; he just didn't persuade the court like the experts for the Estate.
And yes… after an 8-year battle, arguing all the way up to the U.S. Tax Court with evidence and support, the Estate’s valuation team basically told the IRS (and their expert) to: “Beat it. Beat it.” ♪ ♫
The Tax Court heard the arguments presented by both sides and ultimately sided with the Estate's experts determining the value of Michael Jackson's image at the time of his death to be $4.2 million. That's a whole lot closer to $2,105 than $434 million. [2]
And the amount of tax exposure involved? Astronomical. The IRS opinion of value came with severe consequences to the tune of an underpayment of roughly $500 million in taxes plus proposed penalties of roughly $200 million. [4] No pressure.
Even moving the needle a fraction either way in a high-stakes dispute can be life-changing money.
It makes me proud as a valuation professional—not because it was “against the IRS” and not because it was Michael Jackson. But because it shows what this work is supposed to be: an opinion, backed by evidence, defended with discipline.
Why “image and likeness” was so hard to value at the date of death
A key lesson from this case is that the estate tax valuation is as of the date of death—not as of the days of Jackson 5 or Thriller or what we learned post MJ's passing and after the Estate successfully rebuilt and monetized Jackson’s brand.
At the date of death, there were real reputation issues and several allegations in the air. Remember? If you know... you know.
"Michael Jackson, dead at 50 of an overdose of anesthetic Propofol" - Fox 13 Tampa Bay
"...went from boy wonder to global pop superstar to a sad figure haunted by lawsuits, paparazzi, and failed plastic surgeries." - The New York Times
"Jackson's public image had begun to suffer thanks to his ever more extreme experimentation with plastic surgery and of course allegations of child sexual abuse, earning him the nickname 'Wacko Jacko' in the tabloid press." -www.dw.com
The rumors caused uncertainty around future monetization—so valuing his image required separating what was knowable then from what became possible later. [1]
That distinction—between the value of the asset on the day he died and the value after some clean-up by later management—is part of what the court had to wrestle with. [1]
The takeaway for business owners
You don’t have to be Michael Jackson for valuation to matter.
If value affects taxes, legal outcomes, negotiation leverage, or what lands in your pocket, you want an analysis that is defensible—because when the stakes are real, unsupported assumptions are expensive.
And if you’re ever wondering whether a valuation expert’s fee is “worth it,” remember this nearly half-a-billion dollar tax case.
One last reminder: the future becomes the present
And here’s the wild part: while I’m writing this, a Forbes piece pops up saying Michael Jackson is hitting a new streaming career high again—dated yesterday, March 9, 2026. [5]
YES-TER-DAY.
Seventeen years after he left us.
Five years since the tax case ended.
While the experts for the Estate did win the tax case, I am very pleased to know they are, in fact, not fortune tellers. Looks like MJ's image did survive the PR crisis from the beyond and he is still sharing his gift with the world nearly twenty years after this death. I like this version of the future much better.
That’s your real-time reminder that the “future” eventually becomes today. Projections stop being predictions and become the present and forecasts become facts.
Sometimes we’re wrong (really wrong). Sometimes we get it pretty close. But nobody is ever perfectly on the money.
Darn crystal ball.
And still… I hope he’s remembered for the decades—not the last days.
Until next time. - D
"Alexa, play the best of Michael Jackson." ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ ...
I
_______________________________
[1] Estate of Michael J. Jackson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2021-48 (May 3, 2021).
[2] American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC). “Top Ten Estate Planning and Estate Tax Developments of 2021” (summary table of the IRS vs. Estate valuation positions and the court’s findings).
[3] Briefly Taxing. “Estate of Jackson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2021-48” (discussion of experts retained by the estate, including Roesler and Fishman).
[4] Mondaq. “2021 Year-End Estate Planning Advisory” (summary of IRS notice of deficiency amounts, court’s final determinations, and estimated underpayment/penalties).
[5] Forbes (Hugh McIntyre). “Michael Jackson Hits A Career High — For The Fourth Week In A Row” (Mar 9, 2026).♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪ beat it. beat it. ♫ ♪ ♪♫ ♪
Michael Jackson performs during halftime of a 52-17 Dallas Cowboys win over the Buffalo Bills in Super Bowl XXVII on January 31, 1993 at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena California. WIREIMAGE
Meet the Experts:
→ Mark Roesler (CMG Worldwide) Estate of Michael Jackson
→ Jay Fishman (Financial Research Associates) Estate of Michael Jackson
→ Weston Anson Internal Revenue Service
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
How can we help you? Not sure? Book a free consult.
When people hear “business valuation,” they picture spreadsheets, formulas, and math that makes their eye twitch.
But valuation is not fortune-telling. It’s an educated opinion about the future, built using the past and what was knowable at a specific point in time. A valuation expert develops an opinion and then defends it.
And because the future hasn’t happened yet, you can’t have “facts” about it. The only fact about the future is that... it’s coming.
Nobody ever gets it right; but we get close. If you ever meet someone who can predict future cash flows perfectly… I’m going to need them to play the lottery for me.
Related Reading:
→ How Future Cash Flows Become a Value Today (without the math headache)
→ Why Business Owners Should Get a Forecast Every Year
That’s why valuation is part math… and part supporting your assumptions with real evidence.
And one of the most famous examples of that—especially for intangible assets—is the IRS valuation dispute involving the Estate of Michael Jackson.
2009 → Michael Jackson passes away
2011 → Tax return for his Estate likely filed early 2011 (9 months + 6 month extension)
2013 → IRS audits the return and the battle begins
2021 → The case is finally over more than a decade after his death
First, the biggest misconception: we are NOT talking about everything the King of Pop owned
Let’s clear this up right now: this case was not “What was Michael Jackson worth?” in a broad, tabloid sense.
We are talking about one piece of the Estate: Michael Jackson’s image and likeness (right of publicity). And yes, there were other disputed interests involved too—three assets total in the Tax Court fight—but the jaw-dropping numbers everyone repeats are about image. [2]
That matters, because high-wealth estates don’t keep everything in one bucket. Assets are often separated into different entities and structures: image is held in one LLC, music interests in another, real estate elsewhere, etc. [2]
This case—when we talk about the “image” numbers—was specifically about that one bucket: his image.
And for a celebrity? Image is everything.
Public perception can take a celeb's endorsements, brand deals, licensing opportunities, and earning power from “printing money” to “good luck with that” real fast. Just ask Martha Stewart or Lindsay Lohan.
The part that made everyone’s jaw drop: the gap between the experts' numbers
Here’s why this case became legendary in the valuation world:
The estate tax return reported Michael Jackson’s image at $2,105. (That's not a typo. A little over two grand.) [2]
After auditing the return, the IRS issued a notice of deficiency asserting his image was worth $434.2 million. (Also not a typo.) [2]
By the time the case got to trial, positions had narrowed. The IRS argued image value was $161.3 million while the Estate argued $3.1 million [2]
That’s not a little disagreement. That’s a “we are not living on the same planet” disagreement. That's a $400 million difference between the experts' opinions as to the value. Million with an "M". Sheesh.
What the Estate's valuation experts did right: argument backed by evidence
This wasn’t “my opinion versus your opinion.” It was “my opinion with receipts versus your opinion with… confidence.”
The Estate brought in experts for the image valuation and they supported assumptions with research rather than storytelling. [3]
Because in a Tax Court fight, you can’t walk in and say: “I just feel like it’s worth this much.”
That’s not a valuation. That’s a prayer.
For most people, the mere thought of the IRS knocking on their door is enough to keep them up at night but, at the end of the day, the expert for the IRS is also a human being. He had an opinion of value too; he just didn't persuade the court like the experts for the Estate.
And yes… after an 8-year battle, arguing all the way up to the U.S. Tax Court with evidence and support, the Estate’s valuation team basically told the IRS (and their expert) to: “Beat it. Beat it.”
The Tax Court heard the arguments presented by both sides and ultimately sided with the Estate's experts determining the value of Michael Jackson's image at the time of his death to be $4.2 million. That's a whole lot closer to $2,105 than $434 million. [2]
And the amount of tax exposure involved? Astronomical. The IRS opinion of value came with severe consequences to the tune of an underpayment of roughly $500 million in taxes plus proposed penalties of roughly $200 million. [4] No pressure.
Even moving the needle a fraction either way in a high-stakes dispute can be life-changing money.
It makes me proud as a valuation professional—not because it was “against the IRS” and not because it was Michael Jackson. But because it shows what this work is supposed to be: an opinion, backed by evidence, defended with discipline.
Why “image and likeness” was so hard to value at the date of death
A key lesson from this case is that the estate tax valuation is as of the date of death—not as of the days of Jackson 5 or Thriller or what we learned post MJ's passing and after the Estate successfully rebuilt and monetized Jackson’s brand.
At the date of death, there were real reputation issues and several allegations in the air. Remember? If you know... you know.
"Michael Jackson, dead at 50 of an overdose of anesthetic Propofol" - Fox 13 Tampa Bay
"...went from boy wonder to global pop superstar to a sad figure haunted by lawsuits, paparazzi, and failed plastic surgeries." - The New York Times
"Jackson's public image had begun to suffer thanks to his ever more extreme experimentation with plastic surgery and of course allegations of child sexual abuse, earning him the nickname 'Wacko Jacko' in the tabloid press." -www.dw.com
The rumors caused uncertainty around future monetization—so valuing his image required separating what was knowable then from what became possible later. [1]
That distinction—between the value of the asset on the day he died and the value after some clean-up by later management—is part of what the court had to wrestle with. [1]
The takeaway for business owners
You don’t have to be Michael Jackson for valuation to matter.
If value affects taxes, legal outcomes, negotiation leverage, or what lands in your pocket, you want an analysis that is defensible—because when the stakes are real, unsupported assumptions are expensive.
And if you’re ever wondering whether a valuation expert’s fee is “worth it,” remember this nearly half-a-billion dollar tax case.
One last reminder: the future becomes the present
And here’s the wild part: while I’m writing this, a Forbes piece pops up saying Michael Jackson is hitting a new streaming career high again—dated yesterday, March 9, 2026. [5]
YES-TER-DAY.
Seventeen years after he left us.
Five years since the tax case ended.
While the experts for the Estate did win the tax case, I am very pleased to know they are, in fact, not fortune tellers. Looks like MJ's image did survive the PR crisis from the beyond and he is still sharing his gift with the world nearly twenty years after this death. I like this version of the future much better.
That’s your real-time reminder that the “future” eventually becomes today. Projections stop being predictions and become the present and forecasts become facts.
Sometimes we’re wrong (really wrong). Sometimes we get it pretty close. But nobody is ever perfectly on the money.
Darn crystal ball.
And still… I hope he’s remembered for the decades—not the last days.
Until next time. - D
"Alexa, play the best of Michael Jackson." ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ ...
I
____________
[1] Estate of Michael J. Jackson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2021-48 (May 3, 2021).
[2] American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC). “Top Ten Estate Planning and Estate Tax Developments of 2021” (summary table of the IRS vs. Estate valuation positions and the court’s findings).
[3] Briefly Taxing. “Estate of Jackson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2021-48” (discussion of experts retained by the estate, including Roesler and Fishman).
[4] Mondaq. “2021 Year-End Estate Planning Advisory” (summary of IRS notice of deficiency amounts, court’s final determinations, and estimated underpayment/penalties).
[5] Forbes (Hugh McIntyre). “Michael Jackson Hits A Career High — For The Fourth Week In A Row” (Mar 9, 2026).♫ .
Michael Jackson performs during halftime of a 52-17 Dallas Cowboys win over the Buffalo Bills in Super Bowl XXVII on January 31, 1993 at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena California. WIREIMAGE
Meet the Experts:
→ Mark Roesler
(CMG Worldwide) Estate of Michael Jackson
→ Jay Fishman
(Financial Research Associates) Estate of Michael Jackson
→ Weston Anson Internal Revenue Service
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
..beat it ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
♫ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
♫ ...beat it ♫ ♪ ♪
♫ ♪ ♪
♪ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♪
How can we help today?
Not sure? Book a free consult.
How can we help you? Not sure? Book a free consult.
Address
8735 Dunwoody Place
Suite N
Atlanta, GA 30350
Reach us by phone (call / text)
(770) 800-8969 • Office
(470) 478-3055 • WhatsApp
Email us
info@mindyourbizzness.com
support@mindyourbizzness.com
Other Helpful Links:
FAQ • Glossary • Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions • Refund Policy
Want to receive our articles?
© 2025 - 2026. Mind Your Bizzness, LLC. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel
@WeValueYourBiz
Need a notary but in a hurry? Do it online.
Get a Document Notarized Now